Insite LMS
Log in
Roadmap
Feedback
Feature Requests
Log in to your Insite LMS account to give feedback
Log In
Boards
Feature Requests
Powered by Canny
Feature Requests
Please vote and comment on feedback that you would like to see implemented. If you would like to contribute a feature not available here, please describe your feedback and send it to
support@insite-lms.com
Showing
Trending
Sort
Trending
Top
New
Filter
Under Review
Planned
In Progress
Developed
posts in
All Categories
All Categories
General (52)
Desktop Client (9)
Customizing (7)
Time App (2)
Mobile App (2)
Web Client (1)
Dashboards (2)
Interfaces (4)
Import (6)
Report (4)
Companies should have more than one company type
Here we have again a case where we need to create two exact companies only for the type. The supplier is needed for the PO or is more or less created out of the PO Import, from another ERP-System. Then we need to create a subcontractor when he operates on site. Process Packages in Pending Packages needs to consider this new functionality and allow manual adjustments of the target module.
0
8
Allow Filter and Search for Grouping Values
When a list is grouped, several columns are aggregated (e.g. weight in package, quantity in package item and many more). It would be great to be able to filter and and sort by these values.
0
2
Enhancements to print metadata into pictures
Current Problems: • "Description" cannot be added in "Edit picture before upload" mode on the App • In App settings there is the option to "Add a visible timestamp to taken pictures" but no option to "Add metadata to taken picture" • Several user complaint about the old-style orange colour of the print, they would prefer white letters with shadows
1
·
in progress
4
Enhance Import Mappings to support normal textfields
Currently a defined list of tables and fields can be added in the import mapping. We have a use case to integrate several systems and need to map normal text or numeric fields of e.g. material to other values in the database. Please enhance the import mappings to allow more use cases for "normal" fields
0
1
Save Reports to SharePoint
LMS should store documents directly in designated SharePoint folders, linking them through metadata for traceability and enabling easy access to project documentation. This request could be another option in the export functionality, where Blob, Public API and Mail are available today.
1
6
Add return date and notification for tool issue
We manage our tools centrally for our supervisors using the Project Tools module. Some tools are issued for a limited time due to limited availability. It would be helpful to have an agreed return date when issuing materials. If the return date is exceeded, a notification like 'Return date exceeded' could be sent, similar to the Tool Calibration/Certification Warning. This feature would help us utilize and plan these tools better.
0
1
User input for package routing during process packages/shipment finalization
Our users find the current package routing from pending to site or free issue based on company type confusing. We suggest implementing a workflow during the process package/shipment finalization that includes user input to determine where the package should go. This would enhance clarity and user control over the package routing process.
0
2
Increase limit for editing elements
I understand there is a technical limit to editing more than 1000 elements, but it would be beneficial if this limit could be increased. Having the ability to edit more elements would greatly enhance my workflow and efficiency. A limit of 5000 would already be very helpful.
0
4
Pin projects on project switch
We got the feedback that user would be happy if they can pin certain projects at the top of their project list (when switching from one project to another).
0
4
Navigate Back and Next in Dialogs
When a dialog is open (e.g. package, deviation or any other dialog), I would like to click a next and previous button, to access the next/previous element easily. This needs to consider the sorting of the user in the background and should work especially in the web version, because it doesn't allow editing of elements without a double-click.
0
2
Load More
→
Powered by Canny